http://blog.amber.org/2004/09/14/a-matter-of-size/ Thoughts of a minor lunatic Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:48:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://blog.amber.org/2004/09/14/a-matter-of-size/#comment-1284 Simon Brunning Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://amber.textdriven.com/2004/09/14/a-matter-of-size/#comment-1284 Does this matter, really? Does this matter, really?

]]> http://blog.amber.org/2004/09/14/a-matter-of-size/#comment-1285 J.Shell Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://amber.textdriven.com/2004/09/14/a-matter-of-size/#comment-1285 Haven't you heard the song? "Nothing really matters..." Haven’t you heard the song? “Nothing really matters…”

]]> http://blog.amber.org/2004/09/14/a-matter-of-size/#comment-1286 petrilli Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://amber.textdriven.com/2004/09/14/a-matter-of-size/#comment-1286 That's what is so depressing, that as "big" as Smalltalk is, it's nothing compared to the inescapable bloat of Java. I can only hope that .NET isn't as bad. That’s what is so depressing, that as “big” as Smalltalk is, it’s nothing compared to the inescapable bloat of Java. I can only hope that .NET isn’t as bad.

]]> http://blog.amber.org/2004/09/14/a-matter-of-size/#comment-1287 petrilli Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://amber.textdriven.com/2004/09/14/a-matter-of-size/#comment-1287 And the reason it matters is that more code = more bloat = slower execution. It slows a sloppy design. And the reason it matters is that more code = more bloat = slower execution. It slows a sloppy design.

]]>