<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Typical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/</link>
	<description>Thoughts of a minor lunatic</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: petrilli</title>
		<link>http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-30849</link>
		<dc:creator>petrilli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-30849</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the statement that there's not much to gain from RoR, but only in the case of greenfield application development. When integrating with complex existing systems, it may or may not bring any advantages, other than being less annoying. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the statement that there&#8217;s not much to gain from RoR, but only in the case of greenfield application development. When integrating with complex existing systems, it may or may not bring any advantages, other than being less annoying. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwb</title>
		<link>http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-30848</link>
		<dc:creator>pwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-30848</guid>
		<description>While I agree with Joel that it's probably best for most people to avoid Ruby/Rails at this time (Oct 2006), I don't agree with that particular reasoning. Simple fact is, RoR doesn't buy you much but definitely comes with uncertainty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with Joel that it&#8217;s probably best for most people to avoid Ruby/Rails at this time (Oct 2006), I don&#8217;t agree with that particular reasoning. Simple fact is, RoR doesn&#8217;t buy you much but definitely comes with uncertainty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apotheon</title>
		<link>http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-28509</link>
		<dc:creator>apotheon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-28509</guid>
		<description>Funny -- I thought the biggest mistake he made was spending 75% of that essay talking about how everyone needs to use enterprisey stuff like .NET and J2EE instead of agile "unproven" stuff like Rails, then proceeded to spend about 10% of the essay talking about how his own software development process is based on the use of an in-house ad-hoc previously unknown agile unproven buggy language called Wasabi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny&#8212;I thought the biggest mistake he made was spending 75% of that essay talking about how everyone needs to use enterprisey stuff like .NET and J2EE instead of agile &#8220;unproven&#8221; stuff like Rails, then proceeded to spend about 10% of the essay talking about how his own software development process is based on the use of an in-house ad-hoc previously unknown agile unproven buggy language called Wasabi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-28345</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-28345</guid>
		<description>Oh, well put! "Your garage band's guestbook is NOT going to have eBay's scale problem." Should be tattooed on the eyelids of aspiring web application developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, well put! &#8220;Your garage band&#8217;s guestbook is NOT going to have eBay&#8217;s scale problem.&#8221; Should be tattooed on the eyelids of aspiring web application developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: other opinions about the joel vs dhh debate at jonezy.org</title>
		<link>http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-26985</link>
		<dc:creator>other opinions about the joel vs dhh debate at jonezy.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-26985</guid>
		<description>[...] Typical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Typical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike-O-Matic &#187; When Did High Tech Become High School?</title>
		<link>http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-26777</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike-O-Matic &#187; When Did High Tech Become High School?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 06:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-26777</guid>
		<description>[...] Joel followed up with another article, as did David, and several other bloggers joined in. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joel followed up with another article, as did David, and several other bloggers joined in. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres</title>
		<link>http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-26067</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amber.org/2006/09/02/typical/#comment-26067</guid>
		<description>I've known many a great problem, most of which did not happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve known many a great problem, most of which did not happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
