<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The death of Blu-Ray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.amber.org/2008/05/04/the-death-of-blu-ray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.amber.org/2008/05/04/the-death-of-blu-ray/</link>
	<description>Thoughts of a minor lunatic</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CW</title>
		<link>http://blog.amber.org/2008/05/04/the-death-of-blu-ray/#comment-52006</link>
		<dc:creator>CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 23:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amber.org/2008/05/04/the-death-of-blu-ray/#comment-52006</guid>
		<description>Roger,

You bring up a great point regarding the intrusive nature of DVDs.  Not having any children, I certainly can empathize with you.  maybe it is good that I don't have any because I'd be worried about them around my new Sony Bravia 1080P tv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,</p>
<p>You bring up a great point regarding the intrusive nature of DVDs.  Not having any children, I certainly can empathize with you.  maybe it is good that I don&#8217;t have any because I&#8217;d be worried about them around my new Sony Bravia 1080P tv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://blog.amber.org/2008/05/04/the-death-of-blu-ray/#comment-52001</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amber.org/2008/05/04/the-death-of-blu-ray/#comment-52001</guid>
		<description>re: "[DVDs are] less subject to damage by children" --- funny, it was the mix of kids and DVD which brought home the frustration of all the copying restrictions to me. Even kids not prone to wanton destruction --- the kind that would open a VHS cassette to yank out the tape --- could too easily scratch the surface of a DVD. But the corporations would argue that making backups was stealing.

Anyway, DVDs marketed to children are a little weird: some are completely hostile, forcing ads and previews that cannot be skipped, having no chapter codes, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: &#8221;[DVDs are] less subject to damage by children&#8221;&#8212;- funny, it was the mix of kids and DVD which brought home the frustration of all the copying restrictions to me. Even kids not prone to wanton destruction&#8212;- the kind that would open a VHS cassette to yank out the tape&#8212;- could too easily scratch the surface of a DVD. But the corporations would argue that making backups was stealing.</p>
<p>Anyway, DVDs marketed to children are a little weird: some are completely hostile, forcing ads and previews that cannot be skipped, having no chapter codes, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.272 seconds -->
