Comments on: Why Lieberman should spend 40 years in the wilderness http://blog.amber.org/2008/11/18/why-lieberman-should-spend-40-years-in-the-wilderness/ Thoughts of a minor lunatic Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:55:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Doug S http://blog.amber.org/2008/11/18/why-lieberman-should-spend-40-years-in-the-wilderness/comment-page-1/#comment-52629 Doug S Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:27:31 +0000 http://blog.amber.org/?p=3554#comment-52629 I think they're waiting to see if they have 60 votes without him. If that ever becomes the case, his fate under the democrats is more tenuous. Doug I think they’re waiting to see if they have 60 votes without him. If that ever becomes the case, his fate under the democrats is more tenuous.

Doug

]]> By: CW http://blog.amber.org/2008/11/18/why-lieberman-should-spend-40-years-in-the-wilderness/comment-page-1/#comment-52626 CW Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:50:54 +0000 http://blog.amber.org/?p=3554#comment-52626 Lieberman, schleiberman. To think that he shares the same oxygen in which we breathe. Really should just do away with the "berman" and call him Lie. Quite befitting. Lieberman, schleiberman. To think that he shares the same oxygen in which we breathe. Really should just do away with the “berman” and call him Lie. Quite befitting.

]]>